Before we jump into this blog post, let’s listen to the focus piece first. Because it is so beautiful.
Background
Maurice Ravel was a French composer who lived from 1875-1937. He is best known for composing in the style of French Impressionism (a musical movement focused on creating an atmosphere and describing moods and emotions in the listener), and in the last two decades of his life, he was universally considered France’s greatest composer.
Ravel wrote Pavane pour
In 1910, Ravel published an orchestrated version of his Pavane. Have a listen:
The floating melody over light chords portrays a sense of delicacy even over the constant 8th note dance pulse. Each section grows out of the previous sections through the shifting of texture and tone (for example, the orchestral version starts with a french horn solo that is then passed on to a woodwind duet and eventually the strings glide in). And the balance between the various tonal textures – the interplay between the brass and the woodwinds and the strings – is masterful (and also characteristic of Ravel’s orchestral writing). I’d also like to take a quick moment to discuss the harmonies. Modal harmonies pulled from Spanish folk music (read about Spanish harmonies here) combined with Renaissance parallel chords (read more about Renaissance harmony here under the section “Characteristics of Musical Style”) create the timeless yet ethereal sound reminiscent of the pavane’s history. My favorite section is from 3:31- 5:00. The solo flute is simply exquisite, and the sweeping harp and strings conjure up images of some sort of whimsical fairyland.
Do you like the piano or orchestral version better? I’m honestly not sure which I prefer! I like the piano version because it seems more personal, and it’s up to the pianist to create the colors and the atmosphere of the piece. But the orchestral version assigns instruments to the music in such a way that Ravel’s exact tonal and textural effects occur. Either way, this beautiful, mystical piece transports us to another time and place.
I love this piece! I think I like the piano version better for the same reason as you…but I also play piano so I might be biased haha. Have you heard Pictures at an Exhibition? There’s a piano and orchestral version of that one, as well, and Ravel was actually the one who orchestrated it.
I have heard Pictures! It’s such an interesting piece of music. I love the inspiration behind it. There are several orchestral versions of it as well as other small ensemble arrangements. I really like Ravel’s orchestral arrangement of it, and a comparison of the various versions would be an interesting post in the future. 🙂
I didn’t know there were different versions! I love Ravel’s. Sounds like a great post idea! 🙂
“the orchestral version assigns instruments to the music in such a way that Ravel’s exact tonal and textural effects occur.”
That. It is almost always piano for me, but with this particular composition, it is the orchestral version hands down. The piano only version for me feels very alone and lonely and a massive strip down from its orchestral counterpart.
PS: Love your musings, it carries a fine balance of lyrical appreciation together with sufficient analytical content. Thank youX
Thank you for your comment! The orchestral version has so much color in it, it’s wonderful. And I’m so glad you enjoy the blog♥️